TikTok’s US future in doubt as House demands end to China ownership | Business News

TikTok’s Chinese owners are facing the prospect of the video app being banned in the United States unless they sell its American operation.

A vote by the US House of Representatives has overwhelmingly supported a measure to force ByteDance into divestment within six months on national security grounds.

The Bill still needs to pass the Senate to become law.

President Biden’s White House has stated that it would support the legislation.

However, the ratification process would likely be held up by lengthy legal challenges.

Mr Biden’s challenger in the looming presidential election, Donald Trump, has made it clear he would be against a ban.

Supporters argue that the Bill is about protecting Americans and not banning TikTok.

ONE EYE ON ELECTION IN TIKTOK VOTE

This isn’t a ban. Those who voted for the bill have been saying as much all day.

They’re right. It’s a directive for TikTok to cut ties with its Chinese parent company or else face a ban.

But TikTok and Bytedance are not likely to divest. And so the bill the politicians have voted for could in effect precipitate a ban in as little as six months.

170 million people in America use TikTok. Yes, many will be be passive ‘scrollers’ (like me), but many many others use the platform for their businesses. Promoting their products, monetising their content.

This is an interesting moment. TikTok has created unlikely alliances. The most progressive of Democrats, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez in the same camp as firebrand Trumpian Marjorie Taylor Green – both defending TikTok.

But then on the other side, advocating a ban, former Democratic Party speaker Nancy Pelosi and deeply conservative Republican Chip Roy voting for the Bill.

It’s a real mash-up on Capitol Hill and it could influence the voting motivations of young people across the country. Biden and Trump need young voters to turn out in November. Many are hardly engaged in politics. But things like this could engage them and not necessarily to President Biden’s advantage.

It’s no surprise that the Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump, has flip-flopped. He’s usually a China-basher, but on this, he’s not calling for a ban.

The Bill contends that the Chinese firm is effectively under the control of the government in Beijing – a regime that could demand access to data on millions of its, mainly young, US users at any time.

That belief is based on a Chinese law that compels companies to assist with intelligence gathering when requested.

ByteDance denies that it applies.

Read more on TikTok:
What would US ban mean and could it happen in UK?

It said ahead in a statement ahead of the vote: “This legislation has a predetermined outcome: a total ban of TikTok in the United States.

“The government is attempting to strip 170 million Americans of their Constitutional right to free expression,” it added.

It is unclear whether China would permit any sale of TikTok’s US assets and what tit-for-tat measures it may choose to impose in response to any sale or ban.

Representative Cathy McMorris Rodgers said: “We have given TikTok a clear choice: separate from your parent company ByteDance, which is beholden to the CCP (the Chinese Communist Party), and remain operational in the United States, or side with the CCP and face the consequences. The choice is TikTok’s.”

The Senate is widely expected to subject the Bill to greater scrutiny.

TikTok points out that there is no Chinese state ownership within ByteDance or representation on its board.

Crucially, it says it is incorporated outside of China – a fact that seeks to distance TikTok and ByteDance from coming under the influence of the Chinese intelligence law on information-sharing.

Alex Haurek, a TikTok spokesperson, said: “We are hopeful that the Senate will consider the facts, listen to their constituents, and realize the impact on the economy.”

If it was to pass, the company would have 165 days to file any appeals from the date it is signed into law by the president.

It would almost certainly mean there is no prospect of a potential ban under the current Biden presidency.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *